Raymundo Cassani

@jade-l228, the second and first links are the same and they do not work

@jade-l228, this is what I get from your link: Can you upload it in other place? If not, please write me an email, and I can provide you with a...

Sure, I can provide you the link. Please send me an email to `raymundo.cassani[at]mcgill.ca`

I made few aesthetic changes [cb58a53](https://github.com/brainstorm-tools/brainstorm3/pull/722/commits/cb58a5377e2bf74dd235323b97dfac076f313e97) It may be good to have the information about the two approaches in the process GUI. EDIT: @Edouard2laire, can your draft that legend explaining...

Cross-correlation seems the good approach when aligning signals where at least one of them is "continuous", as in your example. However the process aligns simple events. For this it is...

@Edouard2laire, after further thinking on this process to synch. To align signals using markers, the safest way would be to require the user to provide the same number of markers...

> Note that if we look at the mode of shifting instead of mean then we end up with the same lag as the correlation method That makes sense, right?...

@lucwilson, in an unrelated topic, there is a problem if if the requested window is smaller than the data. It is partially handled here: https://github.com/brainstorm-tools/brainstorm3/blob/e08897975c28effa586893804bdec27b95104e60/toolbox/timefreq/bst_sprint.m#L77-L83 However, it seems `opt.nAverage` needs...

There is this post that I wrote about that, it applies for my AORUS15G https://www.castoriscausa.com/posts/2022/06/25/aorus15g-fan-control/ And its respective repo https://github.com/rcassani/p37-ec-aorus15g (A bit of shameless self promotion)

@SIMULATAN, that's pretty nice!