rcarpa

The following query recently put strain on our database https://github.com/rucio/rucio/blob/7f0d229ac0b3bc7dec12c6e158bea2b82d414a3b/lib/rucio/core/transfer.py#L388 Nothing changed in this part of rucio for a long time. There was the 32 refactoring, but I don't see...

we use the last hop fts server to perform the transfer: https://github.com/rucio/rucio/blob/9a8b988f440c0daefc688a66e84a2d9e9dcbbcd3/lib/rucio/transfertool/fts3.py#L829 while we should use the first hop server configured on the source rse

There are 2 rucio config files used in tests. One for the autotests, the other for integration tests. I don't know if it's justified to have two separate files. Try...

Rucio duplicates the checksums of files into multiple tables. To name a few: replicas, requests, contents.... Apparently, that was done to improve the performance on the database side: avoid the...

The current situation of activemq message handling is a huge mess in rucio. Every daemon which needed to perform communication via a message queue copy-pasted the code from another daemon....