Rob Bradford

@weltling I created the repo for you and gave you permission

Cool, please open a PR to remove the bundled spec file.

@liuw Do you think that the 5.15 change could also be affecting the hyperv KVM enlightenments?

Yes, it's something insidious (as timing out related failures usually are) as the main branch has also passed recently.

@sboeuf Top tip: when copying output from the CI use the plaintext version so you don't get extraneous line breaks that make it hard to see what's going on.

> I have a feeling that it might be the similar issue as the one we encountered before in [#2920 (comment)](https://github.com/cloud-hypervisor/cloud-hypervisor/pull/2920#issuecomment-889805373) I don't think so. Block device topology is very...

> @rbradford have you seen this one happening recently? I'm asking because I don't think I did, meaning we should simply close this issue. I think the test is disabled...

@sboeuf It's (finally) flaked again after you added the extra debugging: https://cloud-hypervisor-jenkins.westus.cloudapp.azure.com/job/cloud-hypervisor/job/main/1390/

> Thanks @rbradford for opening this. It's a big change. Some questions: > > * If we remove "-kernel", how to maintain backward compatibility? > We will provide two releases...

> @rbradford I like the approach, this makes things explicit and at this point I think there's no other way to go. IIUC, we could also get rid of the...