extensions
extensions copied to clipboard
Add typeid-generator extension
Description
Screencast
Checklist
- [ ] I read the extension guidelines
- [ ] I read the documentation about publishing
- [ ] I ran
npm run buildand tested this distribution build in Raycast - [ ] I checked that files in the
assetsfolder are used by the extension itself - [ ] I checked that assets used by the
READMEare placed outside of themetadatafolder
Congratulations on your new Raycast extension! :rocket:
You can expect an initial review within five business days.
Once the PR is approved and merged, the extension will be available on our Store.
Hi 👋
I think this is already a part of https://www.raycast.com/jmaeso/uuid-generator, can you check that one out?
Hi 👋
I think this is already a part of https://www.raycast.com/jmaeso/uuid-generator, can you check that one out?
Hey, The generator part definitely is, but this extension also add's the ability to convert between typeid and uuid. Which uuid-generator does not. I'm not sure that fits within that extension. But let me know if you think I should propose these additional features there instead
What do you think @jmaeso 🙂
Hi 👋 !
For uuid generator extension, I already manifested in the past that the main goal should be to keep the uuid generation as simple as posible within minimal keystrokes required. Extra functionalities could be added there. This being said, TIL about typeid, and not sure how that's related to uuids.
Is that usecase really frequent and I just don't know it? Then might have a fit to my extension Is that usecase rare and specific for very few people? Then might be better to isolate it
Since I can't decide if I miss some knowledge vs that knowledge being "rare" I can't take a decision.
Hope my 5 cents are helpful
Note: I see now this typeID <--> uuid conversion is based on UUIDv7 not any UUID version Note2: A good explanation on the topic: https://github.com/jetify-com/typeid Note3: FYI The icon used on this extension is a company logo (jetify) and not mentioned anywhere, not sure if that's important or not
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.
It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊
Could you answer here @jwalton9
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.
It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊
This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity.
Feel free to comment in the thread when you're ready to continue working on it 🙂
You can also catch us in Slack if you want to discuss this.