Add github-code-search extension

[tdkn]

Description

• You can perform searches on GitHub Code Search directly from Raycast.
• You can configure filter options as necessary.

Screencast

https://github.com/raycast/extensions/assets/1296540/724446ee-f8b7-4471-8786-8d3bc2207b76

Screenshots

1	2	3

Checklist

• [x] I read the extension guidelines
• [x] I read the documentation about publishing
• [x] I ran npm run build and tested this distribution build in Raycast
• [x] I checked that files in the assets folder are used by the extension itself
• [x] I checked that assets used by the README are placed outside of the metadata folder

[raycastbot]

Congratulations on your new Raycast extension! :rocket:

We will aim to make the initial review within five working days. Once the PR is approved and merged, the extension will be available on our Store.

[pernielsentikaer]

@thomaslombart, would this fit into the current GitHub extension, or does it make sense to have it as a standalone?

[thomaslombart]

@pernielsentikaer It could be the case, yes, especially since it would be possible to retrieve the user's organizations, which could be an improvement here.

[pernielsentikaer]

What do you think about that, @tdkn - I'm not that much into the GitHub extension as @thomaslombart is, so if we're missing something, please enlighten us 🙂

[raycastbot]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.

It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊

[pernielsentikaer]

Are you still around @tdkn

[tdkn]

I think it would be great to add Code Search functionality to an existing GitHub Extension and would prefer it if possible. I'm not familiar with the existing Extension, but can I use Code Search functionality without setting a Personal Access Token (PAT)? My Extension uses a public endpoint, so Code Search works without a PAT.

[thomaslombart]

@tdkn This shouldn't be a problem in the current extension.

[raycastbot]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.

It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊

[pernielsentikaer]

Would you be up for that @tdkn

[raycastbot]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.

It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊

[raycastbot]

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it did not have any recent activity.

It will be closed if no further activity occurs in the next 7 days to keep our backlog clean 😊

[raycastbot]

This issue has been automatically closed due to inactivity.

Feel free to comment in the thread when you're ready to continue working on it 🙂

You can also catch us in Slack if you want to discuss this.