kuberay
kuberay copied to clipboard
[Feature] Should we stop publishing images on DockerHub?
Search before asking
- [X] I had searched in the issues and found no similar feature requirement.
Description
KubeRay CI publishes images to both Quay and DockerHub. However, the DockerHub bot has somehow been removed from the KubeRay DockerHub account, causing KubeRay CI to fail when pushing images to DockerHub. To unblock it, I opened #1923 and #1926 as a workaround.
I have already decided to use Quay as the default image registry for KubeRay v1.1.0 because (1) it doesn't have pull limit (2) it has more usage log. Therefore, I am currently considering whether we should still publish images on DockerHub or not.
Any thoughts? cc @andrewsykim @astefanutti @anishasthana
Use case
No response
Related issues
No response
Are you willing to submit a PR?
- [ ] Yes I am willing to submit a PR!
+1
It'd be useful to have a warning in the release notes so existing users can adjust their existing deployment if needed.
I'm a +1 to this as well but perhaps we should stagger it a release? At least to give users some time to adjust.
No objections to make quay the default and to stop publishing nighlty images through CI. But do we really have to remove dockerhub support entirely? Can we still publish to dockerhub only on tagged releases?
Thank you for the feedback! I will try to reach out to our CI/Security teams to set it up the DockerHub back, but I think it may be a long process.