matt rice

@oxalica I assume it might not be a high priority since you can implement it in terms of the following without the additional ergonomics/friendlier API, as in the commit referenced...

Seems good to me, I wasn't actually aware of client side progress!

> FYI @ratmice, I hope to relax the `Send` bound requirements on `LanguageServer` futures eventually as part of [#284 (comment)](https://github.com/ebkalderon/tower-lsp/issues/284#issuecomment-1385611695), thereby supporting thread-local futures out of the box. The `Client`...

I am intending to try this out ASAP however, i've been a bit under the weather hopefully this weekend over the next few days I'll feel well enough to sit...

@ebkalderon It seems like it is going to take me a while to do full port of my lsp server so it can make full usage of the new branch,...

Curious I should look more closely at the in repo examples to see if I can spot a difference. I went and pushed the example I encounter the error with...

> 1. I would love to collect some feedback While not a large user (I've only communicated with one person besides myself that I know has attempted to use my...

Yeah, it is a specific detail of the language server being built, the current implementation only avoids self-referential types because because it is borrowing local variables within that threads main...

Seems worth noting that tectonic is based on xelatex, if you run your MWE.tex through `xelatex` it gives a slightly more descriptive error. ``` (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/base/inputenc.sty Package inputenc Warning: inputenc package...

> > ``` > > Package inputenc Warning: inputenc package ignored with utf8 based engines. > > ``` > > I think one should either get this warning or have...