Rodrigo Campos

I tested this on debian 12 (stable), with its 6.1 kernel, and it passes (installed fuse3, with and without sshfs installed). I don't have a lot of time to look...

@evrial there doesn't seem to be there anything related to this there. Version 1.2.0.rc1 is not released due to other reasons, and it is the only thing needed there. Please...

@lifubang cool. So far I've only seen this locally, but I guess a testing/unstable debian version might hit it.

Okay, I've been debugging this for a while. I have a workaround, although I'm not 100% sure why it is needed. Please read this and let me know if you...

@cyphar Nice finding, but no, the mount debian package uses util-linux. See the mount version in your link, it's ancient. I didn't know that site, but I don't believe that...

Output of strace root@lindsay:/home/rodrigo/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc# strace -ff -s 512 mount --bind -o remount,diratime,strictatime /tmp/fuse-sshfs/ execve("/usr/bin/mount", ["mount", "--bind", "-o", "remount,diratime,strictatime", "/tmp/fuse-sshfs/"], 0x7ffd919b7ef8 /* 21 vars */) = 0 brk(NULL) = 0x5644761f3000 mmap(NULL,...

The following is a more "radical" approach conceptually, lot of semantic changes. But something to bear in mind. I was at All Systems Go last week, systemd is trying an...

@cyphar no, it is very different because, while runc forks several times, it never execs into a very small binary to apply the cgroup limits. It just apply them while...

@cyphar But the issues you mention are also in the 1.1 release branch, right? Not creating a release will not fix any issue either, IIUC. Can't we just release runc...

@cyphar Ok, so I assume the release 1.1 still has the same issue. > #3931 and #3876 are both ready to merge IMHO. I would be _fine_ with a -rc1...