rapiz1
wish to support websocket transport
websocket has been widely used and supported by attack prevention providers such as cloudflare
And I noticed that Rust already supports Websocket dependencies and can be used directly
Could you consider adding support for the websocket protocol in the transport type?
I have the same request, and I'm confused by the comments. This is a request for WebSocket transport, not services, and is not implemented. It cannot be "working for you".
Would be awesome if rathole support this. My use case is to expose a port of an internal service running inside kubernetes to another kubernetes cluster. Being able to expose rathole server through ingress would prevent opening another tcp port and reducing attack surface. I don't mind the reduced performance since its not used in the hot path of user traffic.
I have the same request, and I'm confused by the comments. This is a request for WebSocket transport, not services, and is not implemented. It cannot be "working for you".
Ahh I misunderstood, this makes more sense.
Hi @rapiz1 , will PR accepted for this? I have no rust background but i'm willing to learn. I've read about tokio-tungstenite or fastwebsocket as possible library, wdyt?
i tried to make a websocket transport using tokio-tungstenite here
~~It passes the tcp test but unfortunately the udp test stuck. i'm not sure why. maybe anyone here got a clue?~~
PR opened #290
Hi @aa51513 & @remram44 , would you care to try it?
there is a downloadable executable in here and sample config in:
- https://github.com/TelkomIndonesia/rathole/blob/main/tests/for_tcp/websocket_transport.toml
- https://github.com/TelkomIndonesia/rathole/blob/main/tests/for_tcp/websocket_tls_transport.toml
- https://github.com/TelkomIndonesia/rathole/blob/main/tests/for_udp/websocket_transport.toml
- https://github.com/TelkomIndonesia/rathole/blob/main/tests/for_udp/websocket_tls_transport.toml
i've tried running iperf3 through rathole + caddy https and it seems to be faster than ssh port forward (almost 2x transfer rate). But surprisingly, it is sometimes better than rathole tcp, which is odd.