cuml icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
cuml copied to clipboard

SparseRandomProjection improvement

Open viclafargue opened this issue 3 years ago • 10 comments

Answers #3857

viclafargue avatar May 26 '21 14:05 viclafargue

rerun tests

dantegd avatar May 29 '21 12:05 dantegd

rerun tests

viclafargue avatar Jun 01 '21 16:06 viclafargue

rerun tests

dantegd avatar Jul 21 '21 22:07 dantegd

@viclafargue just checking the status on this PR. Are these changes still being worked or need any reviews?

cjnolet avatar Oct 08 '21 18:10 cjnolet

@viclafargue just checking the status on this PR. Are these changes still being worked or need any reviews?

Thanks for reminding me of this. I think that since CI update these changes can be worked on again. I'll work on merging those, a review would then be welcome :) . Thanks

viclafargue avatar Oct 11 '21 09:10 viclafargue

rerun tests

viclafargue avatar Oct 18 '21 10:10 viclafargue

Codecov Report

:exclamation: No coverage uploaded for pull request base (branch-21.12@dd7cbf4). Click here to learn what that means. The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@               Coverage Diff               @@
##             branch-21.12    #3899   +/-   ##
===============================================
  Coverage                ?   86.07%           
===============================================
  Files                   ?      231           
  Lines                   ?    18699           
  Branches                ?        0           
===============================================
  Hits                    ?    16095           
  Misses                  ?     2604           
  Partials                ?        0           
Flag Coverage Δ
dask 47.01% <0.00%> (?)
non-dask 78.76% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data Powered by Codecov. Last update dd7cbf4...e4d4754. Read the comment docs.

codecov-commenter avatar Oct 18 '21 14:10 codecov-commenter

@viclafargue, is this PR still relevant? I see the ops-codeowners were requested for review, but it seems like this PR needs a bit of clean-up before it's reviewable (i.e. updating base branch, merging the latest changes, letting CI run, etc).

ajschmidt8 avatar Mar 24 '22 15:03 ajschmidt8

I think this PR is still relevant, but it wasn't targeted for the right branch. I think that's what triggered the ops-codeowners group to be set as reviewer. Sorry for the inconvenience.

viclafargue avatar Mar 24 '22 15:03 viclafargue

rerun tests

viclafargue avatar Mar 25 '22 14:03 viclafargue