rapid7
docker entrypoint fallback to root
https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/157763b2afa7ac990bc5a4e9a1bd1cfc25cdd58c/docker/entrypoint.sh#L28C1-L30C5
What is this actually for? What happens is:
docker compose up #works fine with new user id
#ctrl +c
docker compose up #does not use the same user but root
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
![github-actions[bot] avatar](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?v=4 "Published by a pub.dev verified publisher"){kind=small}
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
I'm not sure what the origin of that code is; Are you wanting both scenarios to go down the su-exec $MSF_USER "$@" path? 👀
I honestly dont know the intention of the code. I guess what was intended is that each host system user gets a reliable guest user id?
That's a great question; maybe @firefart might remember the nuances here 🤞
Iirc that's because we mount the home directory of the user and the user id running msfconsole and the directory permissions need to match inside the container. So we create or modify a user to have the same id as the user launching the script
