Did you mean? each_slice
msf6 exploit(windows/smb/ms08_067_netapi) > exploit
[-] 192.168.1.3:445 - Exploit failed: undefined method `each_module' for [["x86/single_byte", Msf::Modules::Nop__X86__Single_byte::MetasploitModule], ["x86/opty2", Msf::Modules::Nop__X86__Opty2::MetasploitModule]]:Array Did you mean? each_slice [*] Exploit completed, but no session was created. msf6 exploit(windows/smb/ms08_067_netapi) >
[*] scanning SMB vulns
| smb-vuln-ms08-067:
| VULNERABLE:
| Microsoft Windows system vulnerable to remote code execution (MS08-067)
why i get this error ?
Does applying this fix locally work? https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/18828/files
It should be fixed in the upcoming release if so
no i didnt fix
@sec13b can you update the issue description with the output of the debug command please?
It looks like there's not enough information to replicate this issue. Please provide any relevant output and logs which may be useful in diagnosing the issue.
This includes:
- All of the item points within this template
- The result of the
debugcommand in your Metasploit console - Screenshots showing the issues you're having
- Exact replication steps
The easier it is for us to replicate and debug an issue means there's a higher chance of this issue being resolved.
The error you're encountering with the MS08-067 exploit in Metasploit suggests a problem with the code related to NOP generation, used for padding in buffer overflow exploits. This issue could stem from a bug or compatibility problem within the Metasploit Framework or the specific version of the exploit module being used. To address it, ensure you're using the latest version of Metasploit, double-check the exploit options for accuracy, try different payloads, and look for updates or patches in the Metasploit community. nd thats all also consider debugging the code or seek assistance from the Metasploit community devs
Hi!
This issue has been left open with no activity for a while now.
We get a lot of issues, so we currently close issues after 60 days of inactivity. It’s been at least 30 days since the last update here. If we missed this issue or if you want to keep it open, please reply here. You can also add the label "not stale" to keep this issue open!
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.
Hi again!
It’s been 60 days since anything happened on this issue, so we are going to close it. Please keep in mind that I’m only a robot, so if I’ve closed this issue in error please feel free to reopen this issue or create a new one if you need anything else.
As a friendly reminder: the best way to see this issue, or any other, fixed is to open a Pull Request.