Raphael Coeffic
Raphael Coeffic
Selecting the sensor could prove a bit tricky, and I would like to avoid the mess with sensor "re-discovery" and the like. The way it is right now, is that...
Some of the mess is also caused by the fact that it is not setup for the module, but model. So in theory you could have 2 different values if...
@mha1 thx for the very good summary! So the thing that would need fixing is actually the range of values that can be set, which is quite restricted right now...
Let's have it in 2 steps: - first extend the range to `[0; 100]` (see #2251) in `2.8`. - then see which bells and whistles we can add later on...
A specification maybe as well? Or is reverse engineering required?
> interesting, does it mean, "your" solution is based only by expand lua functionality (or using undocumented lua features), or did Raphael some coding in oTx ? There was some...
@Hobby4life I think this is something that should be looked at in 2.4. 2.3 should not have these kind of changes anymore. It would be much better to participate in...
@Hobby4life hi! Would you like to move this PR to EdgeTX? We have some great advances on 2.4, and it would be nice to have this PR.
@sdellava see here: https://github.com/EdgeTX/edgetx/pull/1039. I hope this is coming as well for OpenTx!
> > @sdellava see here: [EdgeTX/edgetx#1039](https://github.com/EdgeTX/edgetx/pull/1039). I hope this is coming as well for OpenTx! > > Good. Will this update be valid for every radio or only for Tango...