Ranjani Sridharan

> That's an interesting start @ranj063 > > I am not sure however how it would scale. If we need to include all possible configurations with 3rd party modules, the...

> Also question on the "mixin.1.1 -> mixout.2.1": can we specify the pin or leave it blank if it's irrelevant? The pin does matter for the speaker protection stuff, i.e....

> > as far as the routes ni topology are concerned, there's no pin info. We use special tokens for these. > > So how would we specify the connections...

> The IncludeByKey has proven relatively difficult to handle and leads to top-level warts added to the low-level common parts. That's the opposite of what we want to achieve. >...

> I don't follow how you can have two versions instantiating different pipelines but both named host-copier-gain.mixin the name host-copier-gain-mixin is just a name for the template. The name for...

@plbossart @jsarha this is the new proposal to use the extends/overrides keyword. Please see the following commit for examples of how to use the extends/overrides keyword. I modified the widget...

Here's my observation with one of the failure instances (https://sof-ci.01.org/linuxpr/PR5106/build4026/devicetest/index.html?model=LNLM_RVP_NOCODEC&testcase=multiple-pause-resume-50) The multiple pause resume combination that gets started is aplay on Port 0 (stream 0) and the DeepBuffer Port 0...

> what happens if the "DeepBuffer Port 0" is skipped in the tests, do we see an xrun, ever? > @plbossart yes, there're several instances of the xrun happening with...

> what happens if the "DeepBuffer Port 0" is skipped in the tests, do we see an xrun, ever? > > If the xrun happens only in a case where...

> @ranj063 @kv2019i I will implement a `card_tplg_ops`. So that we can focus on the 'sof-soundwire' card, and it is easily to extend to other cards includes the non-Intel cards....