Dawid Rusnak

@tkonieczny, is it still valid?

It's not that simple `s.Mux.Mount` requires a standalone application that is not mounted anywhere. Instead, maybe `HTTPServer.Routes` could need to be modified to struct that will implement `Router`, passing to...

Closing, as I have no idea how to cover that.

It's quite useful to fail on the artifacts problem - otherwise, you may be surprised when there will be actual error, but no artifacts

Hi @ademar59, we are aware of this issue, but unfortunately, it will require significant effort to restructure the application, so we didn't plan it yet. @TheBrunoLopes, it's [**TKC-499**](https://linear.app/kubeshop/issue/TKC-499/ui-bug-having-two-different-tabs-of-testkube-in-the-browser-is) in the...

Just to note - such mechanism is already available in TestWorkflows, but they are not available in OSS. They are available in the free commercial Testkube though. The steps are...

@TheBrunoLopes, @vsukhin - do we have a Testkube organization on NPM? Who can include me there? Or maybe we should use [**kubeshop**](https://www.npmjs.com/org/kubeshop)? Looks like [**@testkube/sdk**](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@testkube/sdk) package has been created with...

It's quite problematic to do that with [monaco-editor-webpack-plugin](https://www.npmjs.com/package/monaco-editor-webpack-plugin) and including in the current Webpack setup. I encountered problems with resolving the workers. Moving to Backlog again, for the moment looks...

We have now the frontend mechanism for that, which simply requires adding `monitLeave` prop to the ``. We should probably incorporate that in all forms.

On the other side, I'm not sure if that should be the front-end. Shouldn't we rather return regular JSON error message from the ingress level?