Should primitive types be allowed in web forms ?

[quilicicf]

Affects: 1.0.0

Issue

As far as I know, web forms always contain named parameters. Having a web form with a primitive type does not seem to make sense and I was expecting the parser to fail in that case.

Isn't that right ?

How to reproduce

RAML file

#%RAML 1.0

title: My API title
/unsupported:
  put:
    body:
      multipart/form-data:
        type: string

Java file

package com.restlet.definitions.raml10.reader;

import org.raml.v2.api.RamlModelBuilder;
import org.raml.v2.api.RamlModelResult;

import static org.junit.Assert.fail;

public class Test {

    @org.junit.Test
    public void test() throws Exception {
        String savedRamlLocation = Test.class.getResource("files/fileName.yaml").toString();
        RamlModelResult ramlModelResult = new RamlModelBuilder().buildApi(savedRamlLocation);
        if (ramlModelResult.hasErrors()) {
            return;
        }

        fail("Should not pass parser validation");
    }
}

Aha! Link: https://mulesoft-roadmap.aha.io/features/APIRAML-118