rami3l

https://github.com/rust-lang/rustup/issues/4189 provides a similar case with `armv6l`.

I'd like to add that you can use the online docs as they are actually equivalent to the ones you're downloading with Rustup.

Closed by #4388.

@ChrisDenton Would that be related to some sort of fslinking change? @lnicola We do know that GitHub Actions installs rustup a bit differently from you'd usually do. That's why we...

> Just pausing for a second before doing `rustup component` seems to make it work: [ChrisDenton/rustuptest/actions/runs/13699673535/workflow](https://github.com/ChrisDenton/rustuptest/actions/runs/13699673535/workflow) Hmmm, in that case it looks increasingly like #988...

Thanks for your report. I believe the X problem here is that the current toolchain file mostly expresses an obligation (a "build dependency"), but some might want to use it...

@giordano I see that https://github.com/JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/issues/307 has been closed. Is this issue still relevant?

> > I see that [JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilderBase.jl#307](https://github.com/JuliaPackaging/BinaryBuilderBase.jl/issues/307) has been closed. Is this issue still relevant? > > We updated the Rust toolchain, but we're still using Rustup 1.24 for doing that,...

> Can we leave this open for a little bit longer? I would like to write some actual code to handle this before we declare it finished, and I didn’t...

> Looks like [clap-rs/clap#1232](https://github.com/clap-rs/clap/issues/1232) is the issue to track for this Currently `cargo` has started using this feature: - https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/14493 - https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/14531 This would be interesting to look at.