spring-boot-microservices-series-v2
spring-boot-microservices-series-v2 copied to clipboard
feat : create native image
[!IMPORTANT]
Review skipped
Review was skipped due to path filters
:no_entry: Files ignored due to path filters (2)
.github/workflows/api-gateway.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymlapi-gateway/src/main/resources/application.ymlis excluded by!**/*.ymlCodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including
**/dist/**will override the default block on thedistdirectory, by removing the pattern from both the lists.You can disable this status message by setting the
reviews.review_statustofalsein the CodeRabbit configuration file.
Walkthrough
The recent updates modify the TestAPIGatewayApplication class in the api-gateway module. The primary change is the alteration of the return type of the redisContainer method from RedisContainer to GenericContainer<?>, along with the addition of the withExposedPorts(6379) method call to specify the exposed port for the Redis container. The zipkinContainer method remains unchanged, and the overall structure of the class is preserved.
Changes
| Files | Change Summary |
|---|---|
api-gateway/src/test/java/com/example/api/gateway/TestAPIGatewayApplication.java |
Updated return type of redisContainer method from RedisContainer to GenericContainer<?> and added withExposedPorts(6379) method call. |
Possibly related PRs
- #805: The changes in this PR also modify the
redisContainermethod in theTestAPIGatewayApplicationclass, altering its return type fromGenericContainer<?>toRedisContainer, which is directly related to the changes made in the main PR.
Poem
In the code where containers play,
A new type blooms, bright as day.
Ports are opened, ready to greet,
Redis awaits, a tasty treat.
With each change, the tests align,
A rabbit hops, all is fine!
🐇✨
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
- [ ] Create PR with unit tests
- [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
- [ ] Commit unit tests in branch
native-build
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Explain this complex logic.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai explain this code block.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Support
Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai generate docstringsto generate docstrings for this PR.@coderabbitai generate sequence diagramto generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.@coderabbitai auto-generate unit teststo generate unit tests for this PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
️✅ There are no secrets present in this pull request anymore.
If these secrets were true positive and are still valid, we highly recommend you to revoke them. While these secrets were previously flagged, we no longer have a reference to the specific commits where they were detected. Once a secret has been leaked into a git repository, you should consider it compromised, even if it was deleted immediately. Find here more information about risks.
🦉 GitGuardian detects secrets in your source code to help developers and security teams secure the modern development process. You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized GitGuardian to scan your pull request.