Rainer Hahnekamp

As in #4262: I'd like to work on that one.

I see. Well, in that case, we might want to discuss a set of testing helpers.

Yeah, then it's up to the NgRx guys to decide if that is something we should have or not.

Oh, that's a coincidence. That's huge. Congrats @gergelyszerovay. We could take this issue as the "issue" and #4252 as the official PR. What I'd like to discuss is the dependency...

Great article, @gergelyszerovay! Please give me some days to collect and structure all my thoughts on your implementation.

I see two non-technical reasons that speak against Sinon. - We want to have as few libraries as possible. The more you have, the harder it becomes to upgrade Angular....

I wouldn't have too high expectations for the internal implementation of the mocking libraries. They are very good in terms of typing, but internally, they are a collection of functions...

I'm sorry for not getting back to you sooner. For some reason, I've missed your answer. I was also thinking about providing something like `createMock` from the testing library, but...

Thanks @jits. Coming from the global store, I would have `readonly: true` as default. Looking at it from the perspective of a locally provided store, it might be different, though....

@markostanimirovic: Quick Follow up here. What should we do with that one? Should I create an accompanying issue where the community has the chance to discuss the API? On the...