deprecate prefix on prefix removal from interface

[mhanor]

Hello,

This issue is a continuation of the second part of the discussion we made in issue #36. And issue #39 is related Currently, radvd is able to be notified of an address prefix being added or removed from an interface, but I'm still interested that its clients receive a RA to deprecate the prefix being removed from the interface, which radvd doesn't do.

Here's my radvd.conf

interface enp0s8
{
    AdvSendAdvert on;
    AdvManagedFlag off;
    AdvOtherConfigFlag on;

    prefix ::/64
    {
	AdvOnLink on;
	AdvAutonomous on;
	AdvRouterAddr on;
	DeprecatePrefix on;
    };
};

[reubenhwk]

Hmmmmm... challenge accepted.

Sent from my iPhone

On Feb 11, 2018, at 10:51 AM, mhanor [email protected] wrote:

Hello,

This issue is a continuation of the second part of the discussion we made in issue #36. Currently, radvd is able to be notified of an address prefix being added or removed from an interface, but I'm still interested that its clients receive a RA to deprecate the prefix being removed from the interface, which radvd doesn't do.

Here's my radvd.conf

interface enp0s8 { AdvSendAdvert on; AdvManagedFlag off; AdvOtherConfigFlag on;

prefix ::/64
{

AdvOnLink on; AdvAutonomous on; AdvRouterAddr on; DeprecatePrefix on; }; }; — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.

[stu-gott]

I'm also interested in this. I noticed this dynamic after my network prefix changed. Clients continued to use addresses that should have been deprecated until the valid lifetime was exceeded.

[Neustradamus]

Any news?