rhombus-prototype
rhombus-prototype copied to clipboard
racket
Brainstorming and draft proposals for Rhombus
In brief, this is a suggestion to modify the reader to read all forms starting with `#` like symbols and then dispatch. For example this would make it possible to...
Currently, xexpr doesn't support HTML5 [boolean attributes](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Attributes#Boolean_Attributes). While HTML5 is not directly related to XML, xexpr has been widely used to represent HTML, so having this support would be great....
Racket modules are wonderful for containerizing code, and we've been given forms like `only-in` and `prefix-in` to make imported symbol sources explicit. However, the _standard_ behavior (i.e. the one most...
To quote @jackfirth: > adding some sort of `#%local-definitions` hook that gets inserted into internal definition contexts and which modules can override the same way they can override `#%app` Is...
I really understand the need for readability, but I find that long names just make source code *less* readable. There are just too many characters on my screen, even though...
Parentheses are an eyesore, is Rhombus basic code ready yet? Can I install it to use now like Honu? So eager for having this Rhombus. `sudo raco pkg install honu`...
Not sure if it's a good idea, but sometimes I want to comment `(a (b) c)` out, but want to leave `(b)` uncommented. Currently, I would comment the whole thing...
Yes, I understand why infix notation is a goal of Racket 2 (or using the current project name, Rhombus). But there are some people love S-expression deeply. I'd like to...
`read`, `enforest` (Honu), `parse`