rackunit
rackunit copied to clipboard
racket
Currently, the `check-info-test.rkt` and `standalone.rkt` tests fail. We need to decide on a resolution to this issue for the upcoming 8.2 release. The story here is that we wanted to...
Working with `typed/rackunit` on 7.9, CS variant, macOS. Here's a rela ```` #lang typed/racket/base (module+ test (require typed/rackunit)) (module+ test (test-case "one" (check-not-false 1))) ```` and then do `raco test`,...
The Typed Racket variant of rackunit seems to be missing untyped rackunit's `check-match`.
It would be great if `check-equal?` accepted multiple values in each of its sub-expressions and then just made sure that they had the same number of values and then checked...
the exception handling in `check-equal?` catches `exn:break?` exceptions and it probably shouldn't
I think that exn:break? exceptions should not be caught by rackunit's exception handling mechanism. They shouldn't count as a failed test due to an error, they should just be unhandled...
In the [Pyret](https://www.pyret.org/) language, tests may be included within the definition of a function using a [`where` block](https://www.pyret.org/docs/latest/Declarations.html#%28part._.Where_blocks%29): ``` fun sum(l): cases (List) l: | empty => 0 | link(first,...
> I think I found an accessibility bug in the GUI view 🙂 It uses color indicators for test results in the tree of tests. This will work only for...
``` (check-exn #px"bad" (λ () 1) "no state") ``` yields ``` -------------------- . FAILURE name: check-exn location: interactions from an unsaved editor:33:2 params: '(#px"bad" #) message: "no state" ``` Could...
It would be nice to have some custom checks that simplify assertions made on sequences. - `(check-contains? seq expected ...)` For each `expected`, assert that `seq` contains at least one...