CHAMI Rachid

Results 104 issues of CHAMI Rachid

Currently, the QGB is unable to query for the genesis params to get the data commitment window. This is necessary to know when to sign the data commitments and for...

C: QGB

For the QGB, we only care about the state of the current unbonding period. That is due to the following: - If no signatures are posted during this period, then...

C: QGB

Move the QGB module constants to a specific consts package as discussed in https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/pull/257#discussion_r838303008

enhancement
good first issue
C: QGB

Renames Eth prefix to EVM across the QGB module

C: QGB

Currently, the QGB orchestrator queries the state for attestations, confirms and unbonding periods. After [ADR-005](https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/22a48e47721acb57030b5c520994ef9d0bd4d82a/docs/architecture/adr-005-qgb-reduce-state-usage.md) which reduces the QGB state usage, the confirms are no longer part of the state....

enhancement
C: QGB

We should use the existing https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/blob/e18de882c3de4ee92e4632af21d4007c1b642adb/testutil/test_app.go#L71 for the QGB tests instead of: ```golang func SetupTestChain(t *testing.T, weights []uint64) (TestInput, sdk.Context) { ``` _Originally posted by @evan-forbes in https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/pull/742#discussion_r975808339_

enhancement
good first issue
C: QGB

Implementation of the https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-app/pull/657

enhancement
C: QGB

If a validator edits their orchestrator/ethereum address, the state machine must react to that. Currently: - if they change their orchestrator address, then it's alright, nothing will change - If...

good first issue
C: QGB
testing

[not blocking] this error message seems a bit confusing b/c now it's possible for the "last" block to be higher than the current chain height. "last" can be exactly one...

quantum gravity bridge

As discussed in https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/pull/878#discussion_r1060145980 and https://github.com/celestiaorg/celestia-core/pull/878#discussion_r1040780793, we could add support for light nodes generating the data root inclusion proofs since they have access to the headers and thus have all...

good first issue
C:light
C:rpc