rodric rabbah
rodric rabbah
Did you try locating the libraries at the root path instead of under /lib? Will have a look at your zip file.
On 3, did you consider an openwhisk java FDK which provides a standard wrapper instead for local development?
Function Development Kit - FDK is the new SDK, haven't you heard? :D
+1 for all three improvements: faster stratup is a win, and main in the manifest makes sense. My immediate concern was with your third point but think an FDK can...
What’s the likelihood of writing a function is Java, with no extrnal libs? Supporting the use case is nice for parity and quick start but I’d suspect if you’re doing...
It’s nice to have - quick start, demo all good. For composer it’s more nuanced. The library is js based today and it’s far more work getting java syntax embedded...
Note: Whisk actions must return json objects. If you change the signature you’ll need to box the return value into an object elsewhere.
@mkouba https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/docs/actions.md#creating-and-invoking-openwhisk-actions ``` The input to an action and the result of an action are a dictionary of key-value pairs, where the key is a string and the value a...
> I'd try to avoid main(String args[]) if possible. Instead, we could allow user to specify a java.util.function.Function implementation as a main class. @mkouba +1, I assume you also mean...
We can, for _java_, provide a singleton object with the fields. It would deviate from the other runtimes but perhaps not so bad as we can then maybe even provide...