later icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
later copied to clipboard

Does the call stack need to be empty for the later code to be run?

Open nx10 opened this issue 3 years ago • 2 comments

I use later in my package to call R from a C++ background thread in a safe way. From looking in the source code I assume later waits for some regular callbacks and, if the call stack is empty the later code is run. (Please correct me if these assumptions are wrong)

Does the call stack need to be completely empty for technical reasons or could later run code while R is in a loop or executing other code? For example: I would like to execute code while R waits for keyboard inputs:

later::later(function() { print("Hello from later") }, 1) 
readline("Waiting for keyboard input") # wait for more than 1 sec. then pressing enter

Expected output:

(Text is printed 1 sec after execution, before enter is pressed)

Waiting for keyboard input
[1] "Hello from later"
[1] ""

Actual output:

(Text is printed after enter is pressed)

Waiting for keyboard input
[1] ""
[1] "Hello from later"

Possibly similar issue: https://github.com/r-lib/later/issues/152

nx10 avatar Nov 30 '21 13:11 nx10

Callbacks in the event loop can be run in these two ways:

  • In an interactive session, when the call stack is empty and the console is idle.
  • When run_now() is called.

So you can run the event loop at any time by calling run_now().

wch avatar Nov 30 '21 15:11 wch

Thank you for the quick response. Could you maybe go into more detail why the call stack needs to be empty? Is this a technical limitation or a design decision by later?

Edit: It seems like Rhttpd.c does not check the call stack. Would it be possible to add a priority flag to later which disables the check?

nx10 avatar Nov 30 '21 16:11 nx10