Re-licensing RPostgres

[hadley]

We are systematically re-licensing tidyverse, r-lib, and now (where possible) r-dbi packages to use the MIT license, to make our package licenses as clear and permissive as possible. To do so, we need the approval of all copyright holders, which I have found by reviewing contributions from all all non-RStudio contributors. @Altons, @ateucher, @baderstine, @baileych, @etiennebr, @harvey131, @imlijunda, @JackStat, @jaredk-porch, @jeroen, @lentinj, @mmuurr, @oz-r, @robertzk, @thrasibule, @trafficonese, @troels, @TSchiefer, @zozlak, would you permit us to re-license RPostgres with the MIT license? If so, please comment "I agree" below. ​

• [x] @Altons
• [x] @ateucher
• [x] @baderstine
• [x] @baileych
• [x] @etiennebr
• [x] @harvey131
• [x] @imlijunda
• [ ] @JackStat
• [ ] @jaredk-porch
• [x] @jeroen
• [x] @lentinj
• [x] @mmuurr
• [x] @oz-r
• [x] @robertzk
• [x] @thrasibule
• [x] @trafficonese
• [x] @troels
• [x] @TSchiefer
• [x] @zozlak

[harvey131]

I agree

[jeroen]

I agree

[robertzk]

I agree.

[oz-r]

I agree.

[Altons]

I agree

Sent from my iPhone

On 6 Jul 2021, at 21:19, Robert Krzyzanowski @.***> wrote:

 I agree.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

[etiennebr]

I agree

[baderstine]

I agree

[mmuurr]

I agree.

On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 2:28 PM Alberto Negron @.***> wrote:

I agree

Sent from my iPhone

On 6 Jul 2021, at 21:19, Robert Krzyzanowski @.***> wrote:

 I agree.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/r-dbi/RPostgres/issues/312#issuecomment-875059735, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLQHCUHTZHPP3VSKN4FCN3TWNRO3ANCNFSM475GO2FA .

[thrasibule]

I agree

[junduck]

I agree

[baileych]

I agree

[zozlak]

I agree.

[trafficonese]

I agree

[TSchiefer]

I agree

[troels]

I agree

[lentinj]

I agree

[ateucher]

I agree

[krlmlr]

@JackStat @jaredk-porch: Are you ok with relicensing RPostgres under MIT?

[krlmlr]

@kofron: Did you use the @jaredk-porch handle when contributing to RPostgres? Are you ok with relicensing RPostgres under MIT?

[krlmlr]

Let's hope we can finalize this for the next version. Still missing confirmation/disapproval from @JackStat @jaredk-porch (@kofron?).

[hadley]

We have made a good-faith attempt to get consent from all contributor to the package under the previous license. This has included reviewing contributions to the package for non-trivial changes, seeking agreement to re-license with GitHub issues, sending a reminding after two weeks, and reaching out by e-mail (where possible).

Unfortunately, we have not received a response from @JackStat and @jaredk-porch. We have carefully reviewed their contributions. Given that the contributions are relatively small, and no one has objected to re-licensing across all tidyverse and r-lib repos, we are going to move ahead with the re-licensing. Of course, if we later discover that contributors are not happy with the re-licensing, we'll re-implement their changes.

[jakob-r]

I agree (although I feel my contribution should not count :) )

[galachad]

I agree.