David Piepgrass

Let me put it this way: I'm not even sure what those words mean. I would like to support it, it's just a matter of figuring out all those APIs....

It's not you, it's me - I should have just started a discussion and @atted you.

Okay, so, in total I've added four operators, `|> ?|> |=> ?|=>`, plus two synonyms: `?>` as a synonym of `?|>` and `?=>` as a synonym of `?|=>`. I'm preparing...

Hmm, getting rid of `NodeStyle` isn't that easy... it's not just `LNode` that uses it, but also `Token`, and `Token` has a stronger case for actually needing it. It's sometimes...

"The Google Domains service can only be used for business or commercial reasons in your current country." Err... wtf? I _think_ it's talking about Google Domains itself and not `.dev`...

Okay, given that my general idea is to figure out how to translate superior or more general PL features into languages with fewer and more limited features... I think I...

Or... - Old languages, new abilities - Otras lenguas, nuevas aptitudes (word order incorrect?)

If the name is good, we just have to figure out how to support all features in all languages. This is, of course, hard and requires a lot of thought....

I've been thinking though... that maybe a master language aka "toff" isn't the first step... maybe even the MLSL isn't step one... but just something to keep in mind while...

@subnut no, I didn't find out why Google says that. I haven't registered the domain I wanted to, either.