qwahzi

@nano2dev @mistakia - Here are the old scoring details for MNN: 

Removing this one from the roadmap board, since it's been replaced by [4198](https://github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/issues/4198)

Removing from V27 milestone due to: https://github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/pull/4626

> I disagree with this idea, queuing transactions is something that should be handled by the node/protocol (as it currently is). It would be atypical to have this queuing be...

> Hi @qwahzi can you propose and share this in nano forum, protocol design? Done! https://forum.nano.org/t/by-default-dont-allow-sends-unless-previous-is-confirmed/1888

Related to this - the default behavior for auto-receives should be not to happen for unconfirmed sends, no?

@mistakia Are there any thoughts on alternate verification methods? I think many people are going to be hesitant to use a method that requires configuring a private key somewhere, even...