qutip-notebooks
qutip-notebooks copied to clipboard
Issue #1208 Test
Notebook testing changes made under issue #1208.
Pauli-X, Y, Z and S,T Quantum Gates using QuTiP: new functions added under issue #1208 are documented in this notebook.
Check out this pull request on
You'll be able to see Jupyter notebook diff and discuss changes. Powered by ReviewNB.
Hi @nathanshammah, besides applying each change required, I also create a stronger notebook with some more theory about qubits and single-qubit gates. Take a look and let me know what you think.
About adding the link to the tutorials.html doc, it's not possible since this PR has not been merged yet, so the link of the notebook is still in my localhost.
The name of the notebook was also changed to Theory of Qubits and Single Quantum Gates.ipynb.
Sorry for the delay. The notebook looks good! Thanks @mlaguna10.
What I'm not sure about is where shall we put it? As a stand-long notebook, only mentioning the single-qubit gates makes the story kind of incomplete to me. And it partially overlaps with the long notebook of quantum gates Quantum Gates and their usage.
What about
- we merge this notebook first
Later, we
- Split the long notebook into a gate part and a circuit part
- Create a more complete story using this notebook and the gate part of the long notebook
What is your mind on this? @nathanshammah @quantshah
Sorry for the delay. The notebook looks good! Thanks @mlaguna10.
What I'm not sure about is where shall we put it? As a stand-long notebook, only mentioning the single-qubit gates makes the story kind of incomplete to me. And it partially overlaps with the long notebook of quantum gates Quantum Gates and their usage.
What about
- we merge this notebook first
Later, we
- Split the long notebook into a gate part and a circuit part
- Create a more complete story using this notebook and the gate part of the long notebook
What is your mind on this? @nathanshammah @quantshah
That sounds great and I'd love to take care of completing this whole plan. I will be aware of what @nathanshammah and @quantshah think to start working on this.
@BoxiLi Just pinging this PR -- should we merge? Not merge?