Tako Schotanus

> Being able to exclude dependencies is something different as in it might hold be back from using jbang because of some classpath conflicts I cannot resolve. I agree with...

It's when all features are implemented by adding yet another symbol. Having to learn (and remember) that for exclusions you have to use some kind of symbol with another kind...

I can confirm at least that the same happens to me locally. It also seems we don't have any integration tests for this? So right now I have no idea...

Btw manually adding `//REPOS jitpack mavencentral` doesn't help.

The artifact _does_ exist on JitPack: https://jitpack.io/#gastaldi/quarkus-registry-generator/-SNAPSHOT Edit: sorry, that's wrong, it does _NOT_ exist. (The page always exists, but no build has been done)

If I remove the MavenCentral repo (and the picocli dep) the error is: ``` Caused by: org.eclipse.aether.transfer.ArtifactNotFoundException: Could not find artifact com.github.gastaldi:quarkus-registry-generator:jar:-SNAPSHOT in jitpack (https://jitpack.io/) at org.eclipse.aether.connector.basic.ArtifactTransportListener.transferFailed(ArtifactTransportListener.java:48) at org.eclipse.aether.connector.basic.BasicRepositoryConnector$TaskRunner.run(BasicRepositoryConnector.java:369) at...

@gastaldi can you perhaps try a quick test by setting up a dummy project with this: ``` jitpack.io https://jitpack.io ``` and ``` com.github.gastaldi quarkus-registry-generator -SNAPSHOT ``` To see if that...

So perhaps it's a problem with the service then? 🤔

THe separate process for integrations is a good idea anyway if we ever want to have native binaries of jbang... :-)

> but do please suggest an alternative to this - i'm struggling to find one that is not worse I don't have an alternative right now that is not worse,...