ops-drafts icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
ops-drafts copied to clipboard

Published 20 hours ago • verified publisher icon quicwg

Section 2.1 (comment 3)

Open LPardue opened this issue 3 years ago • 1 comments

Section 2.1: We do not see "version number field" in Section 17.2.1 of RFC 9000. Is "Version field" meant?

Current: During Version Negotiation (see Section 17.2.1 of [QUIC-TRANSPORT] and Section 2.8), the version number field has a special value (0x00000000)...

If so, should "version number field" be "Version field" in Section 2.8?:

Current: Use of the version number field for traffic recognition will therefore behave differently than with these protocols. Using a particular version number to recognize valid QUIC traffic is likely to persistently miss a fraction of QUIC flows and completely fail in the near future. Reliance on the version number field for the purposes of admission control...

LPardue avatar Sep 13 '22 00:09 LPardue

Yes, using "Version field" in both sections is more clear.

mirjak avatar Sep 19 '22 12:09 mirjak