OpenFermion-Psi4
OpenFermion-Psi4 copied to clipboard
Automatically adding the "missing" amplitudes from Psi4.
Hi,
When I tried to recover the CCSD energy based on the CCSD amplitudes extracted from OpenFermion-Psi4, I realized that some were missing: the same-spin amplitudes.
See here for a question I asked on the Psi4 forum: http://forum.psicode.org/t/understanding-mp2-ccsd-amplitudes-for-h4/1866
Also this is not an issue as they can be determined later on, I think it would actually be better to extract those directly from the OpenFermion-Psi4 interface, because I'm pretty sure most user will not know that they are missing. And CCSD amplitudes could be used in some UCC ansatz.
I would assume this problem persists with ROHF right? If so then yes we should extract the amplitudes for the users!
The problem is solved when using ROHF (which in OpenFermion-Psi4 is used when multiplicity is not equal to 1). But this should still be fixed when using RHF right ?
Hey @bsenjean, sorry getting back to this. I too ran into something similar where I learned the CCSD closed shell amplitudes are S2 and Sz spin adapted (from a very old paper in the 80's which everyone cites). Therefore, as psi4 forum mentions same-spin t2 are defined as T_IJAB = T_IjAb - T_IjBa = T_ijab. Is that what you mean?
Yes, typically these amplitudes are required and computed inside Psi4 but they do not print them as they can be determined from the others by the expression T_IJAB = T_IjAb - T_IjBa = T_ijab. So one should also extract them in OpenFermion otherwise you'll see that you don't get the correct CCSD energy.
One of our student made a subroutine to add them to the ccsd operator in OpenFermion, see below (it could certainly be more compacted):
def add_same_spin_amplitudes(
ccsd_op: openfermion.FermionOperator,
n_electrons: int,
n_qubits: int) -> openfermion.FermionOperator:
"""
Add same-spin amplitudes to a normal ordered ccsd operator.
Largest TIJAB Amplitudes:
1 0 1 0 -0.0060909463
Largest Tijab Amplitudes:
1 0 1 0 -0.0060909463
they are equal to T_IJAB = T_ijab = T_IjAb - T_IjBa
(see
http://forum.psicode.org/t/understanding-mp2-ccsd-amplitudes-for-h4/1866/3)
In normal-ordered form: (if not normal order, add the symmetric term with
an appropriate factor 1/2 in the amplitudes)
Args:
ucc_operator (FermionOperator): Coupled-cluster operator.
n_electrons (int): Number of electrons.
n_qubits (int): Number of qubits.
Returns:
ccsd_op(openfermin.FermionOperator): normal ordered ccsd operator.
"""
if not isinstance(ccsd_op, openfermion.FermionOperator):
raise TypeError('CC operator must be FermionOperator.')
ccsd_op = openfermion.normal_ordered(ccsd_op)
for i in range(0, n_electrons, 2):
for j in range(i + 2, n_electrons, 2):
for a in range(n_electrons, n_qubits, 2):
for b in range(a + 2, n_qubits, 2):
# Make sure that T_IjAb is present in ccsd_op
if ((b, 1), (a + 1, 1), (j, 0),
(i + 1, 0)) not in list(ccsd_op.terms.keys()):
# if one is not present then both are not
# (ie if T_IjAb=0 then T_IjBa=0)
if (((b, 1), (a + 1, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0)) or
((b + 1, 1), (a, 1), (j, 0),
(i + 1, 0))) in list(ccsd_op.terms.keys()):
print(
'CCSD operator incomplete, missing: ', ((
b + 1, 1), (a, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0)))
else:
add_op = openfermion.FermionOperator(
'{}^ {}^ {} {}'.format(b, a, j, i), ccsd_op.terms[(
(b, 1), (a + 1, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0))] +
ccsd_op.terms[
((b + 1, 1), (a, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0))])
if list(add_op.terms.keys())[0] not in list(
ccsd_op.terms.keys()):
ccsd_op += add_op
add_op = openfermion.FermionOperator(
'{}^ {}^ {} {}'.format(b + 1, a + 1, j + 1, i + 1),
ccsd_op.terms[(
(b, 1), (a + 1, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0))] +
ccsd_op.terms[
((b + 1, 1), (a, 1), (j, 0), (i + 1, 0))])
if list(add_op.terms.keys())[0] not in list(
ccsd_op.terms.keys()):
ccsd_op += add_op
return ccsd_op
Great. Do you or the student want to submit this as a PR? It would be nice to have so others know how to "unspin-adapt" the amplitudes.
Sure, I guess a good place would be openfermionpsi4/_psi4_conversion_functions.py
?
I could either modify directly parse_psi4_ccsd_amplitudes
and add the same-spin amplitudes if restricted == True
, or just create another function. In my opinion, it is more a correction than an addition and should be in parse_psi4_ccsd_amplitudes
.
Alright, I added the pull request. I tried to minimize the coding as much as possible, i.e. by only adding one dictionary to store the amplitudes that I needed to compute the same-spin amplitudes for restricted/closed-shell calculations. I realized I needed an additional factor 1/2, I'm not entirely sure where it comes from.
I checked the CCSD energy resulting from these new amplitudes for H4 and LiH, and it worked well (I recover the correct energy up to single precision).