Cirq Enable more ruff rules for the CI

Describe the issue

The internal software pyle has some more rules activated for ruff check analysis of the code. We should enable them in Cirq as well to enforce similar code-quality requirements.

The extra rules are (note that some may need the preview option):

[x] "B005",
[x] "B033",
[ ] "C4",
[x] "D301",
[x] "D419",
[x] "F602",
[x] "F632",
[x] "F901",
[ ] "FURB101",
[ ] "FURB103",
[ ] "FURB105",
[ ] "FURB116",
[x] "FURB131",
[ ] "FURB132",
[x] "FURB136",
[ ] "FURB142",
[x] "FURB145",
[x] "FURB148",
[x] "FURB166",
[x] "FURB167",
[x] "FURB168",
[x] "FURB169",
[ ] "FURB171",
[x] "FURB192",
[x] "ISC",
[x] "N804",
[ ] "N805",
[x] "NPY201",
[x] "PERF101",
[ ] "PERF102",
[ ] "PERF402",
[ ] "PERF403",
[x] "PLE0302",
[ ] "PLE1205",
[x] "PLE1206",
[x] "PLE1310",
[ ] "PLR0124",
[x] "PLR0206",
[x] ~"PLR1701",~ note: remapped to SIM101
[ ] "PLR1711",
[ ] "PLR1730",
[ ] "PLR1733",
[x] "PLR1736",
[ ] "PLW0120",
[x] "PLW0245",
[ ] "PLW0406",
[x] "PLW1501",
[ ] "RET507",
[ ] "RET508",
[ ] "RUF005",
[x] "RUF013",
[ ] "RUF015",
[x] "RUF019",
[x] "RUF027",
[x] "RUF200",
[ ] "SIM103",
[ ] "SIM110",
[ ] "SIM113",
[ ] "SIM115",
[x] "SIM116",
[x] "SIM210",
[ ] "SIM211",
[x] "SIM222",
[x] "SIM223",
[ ] "SIM401",
[x] "TID251",
[x] "UP004",
[x] "UP006",
[x] "UP008",
[x] "UP010",
[x] "UP018",
[x] "UP028",
[x] "UP034",
[x] "UP035",
[x] "UP037",

Tell us the version of Cirq where this happens

1.6.0.dev0 at e7636e0a496f35a5feb50d492ad02e0489368410

Jul 18 '25 00:07 pavoljuhas

Not an urgent issue: should we remove mention of the internal software suite in the title of this issue?

Jul 19 '25 01:07 mhucka

Not an urgent issue: should we remove mention of the internal software suite in the title of this issue?

I feel it is unnecessary, it is just a name.

PS: On a second thought it is not informative for external contributors so I updated the title.

Jul 19 '25 06:07 pavoljuhas

Discussed in cirq-cync: any rules that are overly strict can/should be dropped.

Aug 06 '25 17:08 dstrain115