quaelnix
quaelnix
> Does this not imply the same² cost factor should get assigned to both scenarios? This mainly implies that `highway=pedestrian; bicycle=yes` should not be any cheaper than `highway=footway`. > I'd...
@rkflx, replacing: https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/blob/38fc780055e789ee1beb85b5e4439be7a38d8adc/misc/profiles2/trekking.brf#L289 both with: ``` if ( highway=pedestrian ) then ( if bicycle=yes then 1.5 else 3 ) ``` and ``` if ( highway=pedestrian ) then ( if bicycle=yes...
> I do not know how you measured "average route quality" and what routes you chose to test. I chose more or less random start and end points near highway=pedestrian...
> Reopening seems less work and might cause less confusion than closing issues and then "collecting" them again in a different place. Fair enough.
Right, but the symptoms are the same and reducing the penalty for `highway=pededstrian; bicycle=yes` would fix it: ``` if ( highway=pedestrian ) then ( if bicycle=yes then 1.0 else 3...
This PR adds the following without comment: - `railwaypenalty` (which will affect routing) - `barrierpenalty` (which will affect routing) - `uphillcost` penalty of 80 (which will affect routing) - `consider_traffic`...
> Yes, with a maintainer defect https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/issues/622 would probably not hang for weeks!!! Your assumption of being smarter than the person who created the trekking profile leads to ill-conceived changes...
> From now on I will simply ignore your posts. We can reopen this pull request once you change your mind. > No proof is delivered for this!  ...
> I don't think it's a good action to just close. None of the proposed changes is acceptable in its current form and as long as @EssBee59 is neither willing...
Even with this relaxed query: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1zDU, the rate of false positives is extremly high: - B3: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/364301602 (`cycleway:both = no`) - Parallel cycleway: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/131292244 (`bicycle=designated`) -> Map is wrong. -...