About how the results deal with different downsample ratios used in different methods.

[chalth]

Hi, your work is excellent! However, I have a question to confirm.

In the comparison algorithm, the downsampling rate of the original 'predator' is 2.5cm, while 'geotransformer' has a 5cm downsampling rate, and in your new paper RoiTr, the original 'lepard' for comparison has a 10cm downsampling rate.

My idea is that the final downsampling rate of these methods is different, and the predictable corresponding number is also different, resulting in a large change in the IR indicator. I guess other original methods like FCGF, SpinNet, and YOHO are also done at a 2.5cm downsample rate, but I haven't verified it yet.

So how did you deal with this situation in your thesis? Should all methods be unified under the 5cm downsampling rate, or should we directly compare IR under different downsampling rates without considering this factor?