Fix grpc port by configure via url

[ainyava]

I've noticed that when configuring Qdrant endpoint via URL it does not set grpc_port so I've made a simple change.

[netlify[bot]]

✅ Deploy Preview for poetic-froyo-8baba7 ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	109a653890b12c89f76dabe31c7b7c2c2a051cac
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/poetic-froyo-8baba7/deploys/666756b094299500084e4839
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-645--poetic-froyo-8baba7.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[joein]

Hi @ainyava

Thank you for the contribution!

However, I don't think we'll be able to merge it:

Using both grpc and rest simultaneously is a valid case (and we can't assign the same port for two interfaces) grpc interface does not implement some of the snapshots/shards/storage methods, and the rest one is used in that case

[ainyava]

Oh I didn't know about that, however I think its kind of misleading that we cant use URL and host/port params at the same time while its not clear that how to configure both protocols separately

The real problem we're facing is:

We have Qdrant on Kubernetes and have access to it using Ingress (through port 443) so we need to configure separate endpoints (because our Ingress controller adds some annotation for gRPC, we've defined two ingresses for HTTP/gRPC) so we need to configure port and hostnames for HTTP/gRPC separately.

For now

I just copied every HTTP configuration and prefixed with grpc and changed get_channel function so you could review it again but:

Final Solution

I would appreciate some suggestions on how to resolve this in a clear manner, also If its needed to change the source code, It would be a great pleasure for me to do so.

Thanks, Ainyava