Raymond Kuiper

Please check out https://github.com/jbfavre/python-protobix, the new home for the protobix project.

I agree it would be useful to utilize 'visible name' and 'host name' fields separately, as 'host name' is often a technical name and 'visible name' a more user friendly...

Might be interesting to include more mappings of Netbox fields to inventory fields like serial number, manufacturer, device type, etc.

This should be fixed with the merge of #55 , can you test if this works for you?

Working on this, including github workflow to automatically push the image to GHCR.io. See #55 and further work in https://github.com/q1x/netbox-zabbix-sync/tree/dockertest

I think we can close this one?

This might not be an issue if the name is used for the visible name instead, as mentioned in #45 . However, another way of naming the `host name` field...

I'm also interested in this feature