use the regular readme for the long description
Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
78c55aa) 99.64% compared to head (013ac66) 99.64%.
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2866 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 99.64% 99.64%
=======================================
Files 117 117
Lines 17634 17634
Branches 3172 3172
=======================================
Hits 17572 17572
Misses 43 43
Partials 19 19
Personally I like having a customized version of README for pypi even if it has caused issues due be being out of sync in the past.
(people seeing trio in pypi have different goals than people seeing trio on github. but idk if we adequately address that as is...)
Genuinely, do people ever actually read the pypi readmes? I nearly always just click through to the repository instead (usually because the readme is outdated and wrong).
-snip- huh I can't find an archived page to support my memory so I was probably just misremembering. But I do think I agree that they aren't looked at much...