pyt
pyt copied to clipboard
Add Getting Started guide to README, with a walkthrough of running it on a Django repo
I discovered many SyntaxError during setup.py installation.
build/bdist.macosx-10.12-x86_64/egg/pyt/__main__.py", line 323
if args.print:
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
File "build/bdist.macosx-10.12-x86_64/egg/pyt/analysis_base.py", line 9
class AnalysisBase(metaclass=ABCMeta):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
File "build/bdist.macosx-10.12-x86_64/egg/pyt/fixed_point.py", line 32
def analyse(cfg_list, *, analysis_type):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
File "build/bdist.macosx-10.12-x86_64/egg/pyt/github_search.py", line 124
class Search(metaclass=ABCMeta):
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
yield from get_vulnerability_chains(
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Ahh so this is due to you running in under Python 2, under Python 3, (especially 3.6), everything will run well :)
https://travis-ci.org/python-security/pyt/builds/366758979#L509
Thanks @KevinHock. What is the best way to test a whole repo or a directory that holds all the python files.
Thanks for the PR @cclauss, I will check it out tomorrow night :)
@lfatty which web framework is the repo? You can use find
to list all the files and then run PyT on them with -f but the framework matters a little bit.
Lets say it is django
I also when running a test against django.nV, I got the following:
python -m pyt -f examples/django.nV/taskManager/views.py
/bla/bla/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/runpy.py:125: RuntimeWarning: 'pyt.__main__' found in sys.modules after import of package 'pyt', but prior to execution of 'pyt.__main__'; this may result in unpredictable behaviour
warn(RuntimeWarning(msg))
No vulnerabilities found.
Is this expected or normal?
Try -a E or -a D, it's the framework adaptor option.
Ok, i am not being successful. Can you please write down the commands for that? thx
Thanks @KevinHock, I think this tool is very promising especially if we can make it very easy to use. Also we need think about a new option such as -r, --recursive find and process files in subdirectories
. Just a suggestion.
Thank for the kind words @lfatty, I'll definitely work on that too, I've been overly focused on fixing the false positive and negative problems from our last evaluation, I'll also work on de duplicating any duplicate vulnerabilities as a post-processing step until I fix the root cause.
You can try this python -m pyt -a E -f examples/django.nV/taskManager/views.py --interactive
before I implement the -r
and de-duping options.
python -m pyt -a E -f examples/django.nV/taskManager/upload_controller.py --interactive
has slightly less worse findings, you can edit the sink information by editing pyt/vulnerability_definitions/all_trigger_words.pyt
@KevinHock, I ran python -m pyt -a E -f examples/django.nV/taskManager/upload_controller.py --interactive
and all looks fine. But, when I ran the command against my code, i got the following output:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", mod_spec)
File "/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/__main__.py", line 371, in <module>
main()
File "projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/__main__.py", line 295, in main
FrameworkAdaptor(cfg_list, project_modules, local_modules, framework_route_criteria)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/framework_adaptor.py", line 21, in __init__
self.run()
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/framework_adaptor.py", line 70, in run
function_cfgs.extend(self.find_route_functions_taint_args())
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/framework_adaptor.py", line 64, in find_route_functions_taint_args
yield self.get_func_cfg_with_tainted_args(definition)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/framework_adaptor.py", line 30, in get_func_cfg_with_tainted_args
definition.module_definitions
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/expr_visitor.py", line 580, in make_cfg
module_definitions
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/expr_visitor.py", line 59, in __init__
self.init_function_cfg(node, module_definitions)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/expr_visitor.py", line 96, in init_function_cfg
module_statements = self.stmt_star_handler(node.body)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/stmt_visitor.py", line 75, in stmt_star_handler
node = self.visit(stmt)
File "/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ast.py", line 253, in visit
return visitor(node)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/stmt_visitor.py", line 303, in visit_Try
handler_body = self.stmt_star_handler(handler.body)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/stmt_visitor.py", line 75, in stmt_star_handler
node = self.visit(stmt)
File "/python/3.6.5/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/ast.py", line 253, in visit
return visitor(node)
File "/projects/pythonsca/pyt/pyt/stmt_visitor.py", line 233, in visit_Raise
path=self.filenames[-1]
TypeError: __init__() missing 1 required keyword-only argument: 'line_number'
Thanks for reporting that, I missed it in a recent refactor, I'm sorry about that, stmt_visitor
has 90% coverage but visit_Raise
is somehow missing, I'll add test coverage to that as well.
np. i should be noted that something like def my_data(self)
by way of example. I think we need to revisit self
as user input because it may generate many false positives.
That is a very simple fix, I'll do that after work today, I thought we already had that. Also FYI -a D
is the adaptor for Django, it'll only mark functions with the first arg as request
tainted https://github.com/python-security/pyt/blob/master/pyt/framework_helper.py#L24 I know that isn't fool-proof though.
Great!
Sorry I haven't made/merged the 'don't mark self tainted' PR (finished handling IfExp's and partially done with BoolOp last night on a non-pushed branch) if you're curious it should be just checking the first arg here https://github.com/python-security/pyt/blob/master/pyt/framework_adaptor.py#L44
Fixed it ;) https://github.com/python-security/pyt/pull/119 Thanks 👍
Thanks @KevinHock. I will test it and will keep you posted.