Explicitly print gitignored

[evanrittenhouse]

Resolves: python-poetry/poetry#6443

• [ ] Added tests for changed code.
• [ ] Updated documentation for changed code.

Didn't add tests as it's just a matter of calling the logger. I also fixed a typo, changing explicitely_<excluded | included> to explicitly_<excluded | included>.

PR for https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/6443

[dimbleby]

you seem not to have logged the vcs_ignored_files - which are the ones https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/6443 actually complains about being unlogged

perhaps it would be better just to log the final answer from ignored?

[evanrittenhouse]

Thanks for the comment! Fixed. Curious under what conditions a file will be explicitly_excluded? l see that it's an instance field in ProjectPackage, but I'm wondering what that looks like when actually using Poetry.

[neersighted]

Thanks for the comment! Fixed. Curious under what conditions a file will be explicitly_excluded? l see that it's an instance field in ProjectPackage, but I'm wondering what that looks like when actually using Poetry.

There is an exclude = field in pyproject.toml to explicitly exclude files.

[evanrittenhouse]

Curious how the Poetry milestone system works.

[evanrittenhouse]

Does being added to the milestone mean that this is good to go, or is more work required?

[dimbleby]

this currently has merge conflicts, it's certainly not good to go before they are resolved

[evanrittenhouse]

Sorry, missed the merge conflicts - just resolved them @dimbleby

[evanrittenhouse]

@dimbleby just bumping this. No rush.

[dimbleby]

nothing I can do with it, I'm just a humble contributor

[evanrittenhouse]

@neersighted bumping this

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
1.0% Duplication