pipenv
pipenv copied to clipboard
pipenv install still doing full lock resolution
In pipenv 2024.0.0 we made changes to install path, and my assumption was it would behave more like the upgrade path, but I saw first hand today its re-locking everything.
Analysis for Issue #6267:
Analysis of Pipenv Issue #6267
1. Problem Summary:
The issue describes a performance regression in Pipenv 2024.0.0, where the pipenv install command, even when installing a single package, triggers a full dependency resolution. This behavior was unexpected, as the user anticipated a more targeted resolution akin to the upgrade command.
2. Comment Discussion Analysis:
The comments reveal two key points:
- Confirmation of Issue: The maintainer acknowledges the problem, implying that the current behavior is unintentional.
- Initial Solution Flawed: The initial code suggestion by the analysis tool is deemed incorrect. While targeting the right area (
do_install), it suggests creating a new constraint file, which is redundant given existing functionality in theupgradepath.
3. Proposed Resolution:
The goal is to leverage the existing upgrade logic for single-package installations to avoid unnecessary full resolution.
Code Changes:
- File:
pipenv/routines/install.py - Function:
do_install
Current Code: (Simplified)
def do_install(
project,
packages=False,
editable_packages=False,
# ... other parameters
):
# ... existing code ...
if not packages and not editable_packages:
# Perform full lock resolution
do_init(project, ...)
else:
# Add packages to Pipfile
# ... (Existing code) ...
# Perform full lock resolution
do_init(project, ...)
# ... existing code ...
Proposed Code:
def do_install(
project,
# ... existing parameters
packages=None,
editable_packages=None,
# ...
):
# ... existing code ...
if not packages and not editable_packages:
# Perform full lock resolution
do_init(project, ...)
else:
# Add packages to Pipfile
# ... (Existing code) ...
# Utilize the upgrade logic for targeted resolution
from pipenv.routines.update import upgrade
upgrade(project, packages=packages, editable_packages=editable_packages, ...)
# ... existing code ...
4. Code Snippet:
The code snippet is included in the "Proposed Code" section.
5. Additional Steps/Investigations:
- Refactor
do_install: The function should be refactored to clearly separate the logic for single-package installation and full installation, making the code more maintainable. - Utilize Existing
upgradeFunction: Leverage the existingupgradefunction for single-package installations instead of duplicating code. Ensure thatupgradehandles single-package additions correctly and efficiently. - Comprehensive Testing:
- Develop test cases for single package installations, full installations, and edge cases (e.g., installing a package already present with a different version).
- Test the modified code with various project structures and dependency complexities.
- Performance Benchmarking: Compare the performance of the modified
installpath to the existing full resolution approach, especially for projects with numerous dependencies. - Documentation: Clearly document the updated behavior of
pipenv installin the documentation, particularly when specific packages are provided as arguments.
Impact on Pipenv:
- Improved Efficiency: The proposed change will significantly improve performance when installing individual packages by avoiding unnecessary full resolution.
- Maintainability: Reusing the
upgradelogic for single-package installations will reduce code duplication and improve maintainability. - Clarity: Explicitly separating the logic for different installation scenarios will enhance code readability and understanding.
By implementing the suggested changes and conducting thorough testing, Pipenv can regain the efficiency it lost in version 2024.0.0 while maintaining accuracy and consistency in dependency management.
==================================================
fyi -- Testing out some Gen AI code analysis of recent issues