Use mock.patch.object to avoid protected access errors.
Having 2 PR solving the same problem in the same file is over the top, and wasting my time, since I have to review them.
Um, it's a different file right? Path for this PR looks to be test/framers/test_tbc_transaction.py while #2251 is for test/test_transaction.py. So test/framers/test_tbc_transaction.py is rather similar to test/test_transaction.py, are we supposed to have both of these tests or just one?
If you had a look at the files you would see it’s the same file, just copied to prepare for major changes.
tbc == to be changed
If you had a look at the files you would see it’s the same file,
Yeah...I missed that somehow, had assumed it wasn't an exact duplicate so had applied the same fixes from the other one.
just copied to prepare for major changes.
Um, so I should make sure changes are duplicated between the files?
No you should not touch a file marked "to be changed" unless you want to change it as intended.
change it as intended.
How is it intended to be changed?
Read the issues, it will be integrated in framers.
This PR is stale because it has been open 45 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 10 days.
This PR was closed because it has been stalled for 10 days with no activity.