make Cl() return layout only , why do we have Cl()?

[arsenovic]

since blades are in layout, Cl() doesnt need to return a tuple of layout, blades, rather it could just return layout. this would make for mildly cleaner code. this will break things, so its worth considering. also i think we could consider changing Cl() to ga(), so we can write

g3 = ga(3)

could even remove the a, so its g3 =g(3), since its a method. which brings up the point, why are we not just using the layout constructor? couldnt the stuff in Cl() be moved into Layout.__init__? and why isnt Layout called Ga or G or whatever,

[hugohadfield]

This definitely sounds sensible but isn't really a pain point for me atm, it works at the moment even if it is kinda weirdly done

[eric-wieser]

What does Cl stand for?