PyBaMM icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
PyBaMM copied to clipboard

Variable problem of lithium_ionModel

Open Santiagopeacely opened this issue 1 year ago • 1 comments

pybamm.lithium_ion.DFN(). Is there a problem with the expression of the two variables related to the heating of positive and negative current collectors? Their heating power is only on the order of 1E-5. image

Santiagopeacely avatar Aug 19 '24 02:08 Santiagopeacely

Can you provide a minimum working example about this bug?

brosaplanella avatar Aug 27 '24 14:08 brosaplanella

I'm not sure if this detail is a bug, but I think the amount of heat generated by the current collector is a bit small.

Santiagopeacely avatar Nov 15 '24 11:11 Santiagopeacely

The calculations are correct. For example, for a 10 um thick copper collector at a current density of 3 mA/cm2 (one side coat), the ohmic heating is 1.55E-5 W/m3. At the same time, the value completely disagrees with reality. It should be several orders of magnitude higher. This is due to a simple reason. The calculated ohmic heating is for conduction through the (collector) plane; in practice, the heating is related to conduction in the (collector) plane. Getting the correct value would require solving an additional PDE in 2D. I believe that as it stands, ohmic heating for current collectors is a bit misleading, but I guess it is required.

MarcinK00 avatar Dec 03 '24 09:12 MarcinK00