Fix NoneType object is not subscriptable from _insert_filtered_annotations

[khink]

There are cases where the IndirectObject is not None, but d[0] will fail with TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable in generic/_base.py, at return self._get_object_with_check()[key].

I previously reported this issue in #3211, but the fix for that issue didn't fix this one.

Unfortunately i still can't attach the PDF file that triggered this issue, because it contains personal information. If someone has an idea how to create a PDF to test this with, i'd be happy to try. I fully understand that a maintainer would not be keen on including fixes for rare bugs without a test.

More details on the error

The script i used to reproduce the error:

import glob

from pypdf import PdfWriter


def merge_pdfs():
    with PdfWriter() as merger:
        for pdf in glob.glob("*.pdf"):
            merger.append(pdf)
        merger.write("merged.pdf")

if __name__ == '__main__':

    merge_pdfs()

In the script directory i have a broken.pdf (the offending file i can't share here) and an empty.pdf.

This fails as below:

Object 6 0 not defined.
Object 6 0 not defined.
Overwriting cache for 0 6
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/check_merge.py", line 21, in <module>
    merge_pdfs()
    ~~~~~~~~~~^^
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/check_merge.py", line 16, in merge_pdfs
    merger.append(pdf)
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/pypdf/_writer.py", line 2693, in append
    self.merge(
    ~~~~~~~~~~^
        None,
        ^^^^^
    ...<4 lines>...
        excluded_fields,
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    )
    ^
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/pypdf/_writer.py", line 2851, in merge
    lst = self._insert_filtered_annotations(
        pag.original_page.get("/Annots", []), pag, srcpages, reader
    )
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/pypdf/_writer.py", line 3055, in _insert_filtered_annotations
    p = self._get_cloned_page(d[0], pages, reader)
                              ~^^^
  File "/home/kees/Projects/pypdf/pypdf/generic/_base.py", line 402, in __getitem__
    return self._get_object_with_check()[key]  # type: ignore
           ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

Setting a breakpoint before the error occurs gives:

(Pdb) d
IndirectObject(6, 0, 127177489623296)
(Pdb) d[0]
Object 6 0 not defined.
Overwriting cache for 0 6
*** TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not subscriptable

(To be fair, in this last example i cheated a bit because the variable name d clashes with the pdb command. So i renamed that.)

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 96.95%. Comparing base (bc318d7) to head (9a27b3f). :warning: Report is 20 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pypdf/_writer.py	50.00%	2 Missing :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3444      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.97%   96.95%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        9337     9340       +3     
  Branches     1711     1711              
==========================================
+ Hits         9055     9056       +1     
- Misses        168      170       +2     
  Partials      114      114              

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[stefan6419846]

Thanks for the PR. Please have a look at the failing checks.

[khink]

Thanks for the PR. Please have a look at the failing checks.

@stefan6419846 Which checks do you mean? I only see coverage, which i can't fix, as i stated in the description. If you see anything else that i could improve that would make you consider merging this, please let me know!

[stefan6419846]

Which checks do you mean? I only see coverage, which i can't fix, as i stated in the description. If you see anything else that i could improve that would make you consider merging this, please let me know!

We have three failing checks:

• The patch coverage is incomplete, as we have no test for the error case.
• The project coverage decreases due to missing patch coverage.
• The PR title does not match our requirements.

At least the title should be solvable directly.

Unfortunately i still can't attach the PDF file that triggered this issue, because it contains personal information. If someone has an idea how to create a PDF to test this with, i'd be happy to try.

There surely are ways to modify existing example files used in tests to show this behavior (you should be able to find some examples in the tests). I currently do not have enough resources to look into this myself. There are ways to manually anonymize your file as well, but this requires more knowledge and might require you providing me the original file to look into.