More types

[LiteApplication]

Depends on #285 New Serializable (v3)

All the types described in the list on Wiki.vg are now implemented and fully tested.

[LiteApplication]

Thank you for the review, I'm about to commit my changes but should I add the new types I wrote for the packets ?

The current PR contains everything listed on the top of the "Current protocol" page, but there are some types missing that I noticed and implemented later.

[ItsDrike]

Oh, well, if the types are needed by some packets then yeah add them, if not, why are they even useful for us?

[LiteApplication]

They are defined later in the page, or on other page, it's a bit of a mess (like the whole brigadier for example, or the Trade format, the crafting recipe type, ...)

[LiteApplication]

The PR diff size of 21048 lines exceeds the maximum allowed for the inline comments feature.

Don't worry buddy, it's gonna be alright.

[LiteApplication]

Marking as draft to give me time to use NamedTuples when it's needed

[LiteApplication]

Thing left to do before merging :

• [x] Use attrs validators instead of the validate function
• [x] Use converters when applicable
• [x] Get some actual data on the NBT serialization process

[LiteApplication]

I didn't manage to check the NBT for myself in this particular case but I was able to extract some packets and verify that they do not include the name tag, as stated in the documentation.

[LiteApplication]

I re-ran the tests with basedpyright, everything seems fine

[LiteApplication]

Shouldn't this get merged ?

[LiteApplication]

Ok great, I have been a little busy too. I'll try to make the changes soon !