Paul Walsh

Hey @nichtich @ioggstream I'm not sure about this. This is actually an issue I started 7 years ago and to my knowledge there is very little interest in really trying...

@roll I think @akariv 's suggestion is preferable

@roll while frictionlessdata/datapackage-py#243 refers to a `cache` property, it has a different use and meaning to the above as far as I see.

What's the issue exactly? It used to be: https://github.com/dataprotocols/schemas/blob/f502096cfd34ede6879942ee8d4a97bd8ff66301/data-package.json#L128 Which has almost no specificity whatsoever. I can't see anything here that is non-compliant. Can you outline the issues?

ok, so it hasn't diverged, but we should consolidate for DRY. Remember that these schemas are used in very different ways, and every $ref we need to check it does...

Yes, the available JSON Schema validators in python and javascript don't support all features of the spec. In any event, I don't think this is something that needs to be...

@zhenyab can you please take a quick look at this.

@bnvk we'd welcome any input here :)

Hi @icklecows unfortunately recent changes that target v1, slated for release at the end of this year, have been merged directly onto master ( cc @rufuspollock ). This is one...

@rgrp still relevant?