pvlakshm

Results 18 comments of pvlakshm

Is this represented in the perf workloads we use? If so, is this a regression?

As @smadala mentioned some of the components required to light up this scenario are not part of the Build Tools SKU. This will currently not work (as you have observed)...

I am afraid this scenario will not work. Getting this right components packaged into the Build Tools SKU will likely figure for inclusion only in the next planning cycle. I...

Xamarin support can be enabled in a manner similar to what is used for UWP today. It means that the `vstest` platform be able to deploy-to-target and run the tests...

@whoisj, This looks like a good usecase for writing a custom assertion. Would you like to give that a try? Writing custom assertions is documented in this [RFC](https://github.com/Microsoft/testfx-docs/blob/master/RFCs/002-Framework-Extensibility-Custom-Assertions.md). There is...

[Here](https://github.com/Microsoft/testfx/blob/abd5ea3585657914490c83d5d2b4c9e732640a89/src/Adapter/MSTest.CoreAdapter/Execution/TestMethodFilter.cs#L24) is where we have a list of supported properties today

We should support ordered tests in a generic manner and not restrict it to only MSTest framework based tests - perhaps as yet another extension point offered by the test...