Joshua Pulsipher

> I don't think we should support it. This would complicate the syntax a bit.... I don't know if it is worth taking such a shortcut. I think this feature...

Following up on this, I have run into a use case (the case study behind the FOCAPO-CPC paper) where using one variable significantly improves the performance for a linear model...

> Can you illustrate what you mean with having logical expressions as the arguments? Is this to avoid defining a Boolean variable for the logical expression and using that Boolean...

I am not sure I am the right person to assign here, my past and current milestone priorities pertain to the strategic model. If I find extra time, I can...

Adding to the conversation, I have also hit this issue trying to use Interpolations.jl (which requires OffestArrays) with JuMP. @CasBex is correct that simply adding `AbstractUnitRange` to JuMP is not...

Hi there, The quoted admonition is removed in the development version of the package that will be released relatively soon. The current version uses its own nonlinear expression system, but...

Thanks for the clarification on your use case. This certainly provides a compelling argument for the proposed array-valued AD system in JuMP. Coming up with an efficient approach to compute...

> > Out of curiosity, did the memoize approach fail using the master branch? > > No, it was with latest release. I think that the problem was related to...

Good idea @Robbybp. @baggepinnen and @aml5600: if you can point me to a simple example of a MTK model use case, I can try and make a proof of concept...

Good work, before proceeding please address the failing test. I will work on a patch to fix the failing docs.