Philip Chimento

GJS exceptions can't be caught across the boundary of a signal handler. So if a signal handler or idle function throws an exception, then your test won't fail. Possibly Jasmine...

The [README](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decimal#common-elements) describes a `maximumSignificantDigits` option to `Decimal.round()` while the [Decimal128](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decimal/blob/master/decimal128-reference.md#decimal128roundvalue--options) and [BigDecimal](https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decimal/blob/master/bigdecimal-reference.md#bigdecimalroundvalue--options) references do not. There are probably more of these discrepancies. We should do a run-through of the...

This corresponds to a yet-to-be-presented potential normative change, to simplify the Temporal proposal. This PR is split into two commits, for ease of review. The first one is just a...

Math.sumPrecise testing plan

3

Boilerplate - [x] Property descriptor - [x] Function length - [x] Function name - [x] Is not a constructor - [ ] prototype is Function.prototype - [ ] is extensible...

Guidance on writing testing plans and where to include them in the process

1

We'd like to encourage proposal champions to write testing plans as part of the process of moving proposals into stage 2.7. Currently, testing plans are not written very often, and...

These test changes correspond to the normative changes in https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/pull/3334 (first commit) and https://github.com/tc39/proposal-temporal/pull/2856 (second commit). These normative changes gained consensus in the June 2024 TC39 meeting.

These are the test changes for the remaining API removals which reached TC39 consensus in June 2024: Temporal.Calendar, Temporal.TimeZone, the getCalendar methods, Temporal.ZonedDateTime.prototype.getTimeZone, and the getISOFields methods. I'm well aware...

Automatically add a results table for CI runs on pull requests

1

I've noticed several times that the meaning of the CI results is confusing for contributors:  This looks like it is saying "all engines passed these tests." What it really...

ChakraCore support

1

In https://github.com/devsnek/esvu/commit/99600f18e3b19608d79037a7c9bbb0c437118874 ChakraCore support was removed. Per @rhuanjl, the crashes have been fixed, so re-adding ChakraCore support seems like a possibility. As part of this, there'd probably need to be...

See https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-clocks/issues/69#issuecomment-2214499257. This is intended as a starting point for discussion about what's possible.